Legal Opinion

In re Doe

Texas Supreme Court

Decided August 29, 2014No. 13-0073PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hecht

in which Justice GREEN, Justice WILLETT, Justice GUZMAN, and Justice BROWN joined.

Rule 202 of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure allows “a proper court” to authorize a deposition to investigate a potential claim before suit is filed.1 In this original mandamus proceeding, relator argues that a proper court must have personal jurisdiction over the potential defendant, or if not, the rule violates due process guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment. We agree with the first argument and do not reach the second. Accordingly, we conditionally grant mandamus relief and direct the trial court to…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S. A. v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. In re ElliottCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2016
  2. in Re City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  3. In re DePinhoTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Hous. Indep. Sch. Dist. v. DurrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2018
  5. Hughes v. GiammancoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2019

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API