Legal Opinion
United States v. Casciano
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided May 20, 1996No. 1:95-cv-00400PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
MUNSON, Senior District Judge.
The court now considers the post-trial motions of Michael A. Casciano. After a jury trial in April of 1996 in Syracuse, New York, defendant was convicted of one count of crossing a state line with the intent to engage in conduct in violation of a protection order, as prohibited by 18 U.S.C. § 2262(a)(1). Defendant opted not to present written post-trial papers, but instead to rely on his oral motions made during trial and after the judgment. Letter from Ronald J. Pelligra, Esq., Apr. 19,1996, Doc. 48. The following constitutes the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Curley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- United States v. Carluin SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Kevin v. Leroy and John Hitchings, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Ralph Kelly Taylor, IICourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- City of Seattle v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
- United States v. MurgasDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1998
- United States v. Michael A. CascianoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. WrightDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1997
- United States v. JamesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016