Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Smith

Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)

Decided October 7, 1991No. 07-91-0177-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Chief Justice.

In the trial court, appellant L.T. Smith was unsuccessful in obtaining habeas corpus relief from being twice placed in jeopardy after the court found an impaneled juror was disqualified and, over appellant’s objection, declared a mistrial with a new trial to follow. He contends the State’s attempt at a second prosecution for the same offense is a violation of his constitutional guarantee against double jeopardy, because the trial court erroneously (1) found jeopardy did not attach at the first trial, (2) found manifest necessity for a mistrial existed, and (3) failed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carrillo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Landrum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
  4. Ex Parte BronsonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Strickland v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Garner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1996
  3. Mayo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  4. Ex Parte James, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1998
  5. State v. Rhodes, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API