Strickland v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
McCLUNG, Justice.
Harold Strickland was convicted by a jury of possession of a prohibited weapon. On appeal, appellant asserts double jeopardy and unlawful search and seizure. Because we agree that appellant’s second trial was violative of double jeopardy, we reverse and acquit.
After the jury was empaneled and sworn for appellant’s first trial, one juror moved out of the county. As a result, the trial court granted a mistrial on its own motion. Appellant objected to the mistrial, but his objection was overruled. A second trial was held before a new jury of twelve, and appellant was convicted.
Je…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Illinois v. SomervilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Torres v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Ricketts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Hegar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Maten v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1998
- Ex Parte Smith, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1991
- Garza v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.