Irwin v. Smith
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion
On. Petition for a Rehearing.
Elliott, J.
— In the opinion of the court, delivered by Sgott, J., it was said that the motion for a new trial did not present any question upon the instructions. The language of the opinion upon this point is as follows: “The fifth cause for a new trial, together with the various subdi-. visions, presents no question for this court, nor did it present any question to the court below, either at special or general term.” The cause for a new trial, to which reference is made in the preceding quotation, was in appellees’ motion thus stated: “5. For errors of law…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Aurora Fire Insurance v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Kesler v. MyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Burdick v. HuntIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Sidener v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Dawson v. CoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.