Legal Opinion

Burdick v. Hunt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 33 opinions

From the Marion Common Pleas.

1Opinion of the CourtPettit, J.

This appeal must be dismissed under rule one of this court. The caption or heading of the assignment of errors is as follows:

“William P. Burdick v. Julia A. Hunt, Adm’x of David P. Hunt, and v. Judson Hale.”

The names of the parties below are these: “Wm. P. Burdick v. Judson Hale, Mrs. Hale, his wife, Jacob Klingensmith, and Julia A. Hunt.”

The transcript does not show in any way that any of these persons had ceased to be parties to this shit before it was terminated, and consequently they must be parties to the assignment of errors on an appeal to this court.

2Cited by33 opinions

  1. Hinshaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. McDonald v. McDonaldIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. State v. CampbellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  4. United States v. FarringtonDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1881
  5. Sidener v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API