Legal Opinion
Layman v. State
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided June 1, 2006No. 26146PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Justice TOAL:
Petitioners 1 brought this action in response to the enactment on July 1, 2005 of the State Retirement System Preservation and Investment Reform Act 2 (Act 153). Act 153 amends several statutes relating to the operation of the South Carolina Retirement System. Specifically, Act 153 brought about significant changes for employees who participate in TERI. 3 In addition, Act 153 affected employees who are not TERI participants but have retired and returned to work for the State in positions covered by the retirement system (working retiree program). 4
In January of 2001, the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- South Carolina State Ports Authority v. Jasper CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Sloan v. SanfordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2004
- Sloan Ex Rel. Resident, Taxpayer & Registered Elector v. Wilkins Ex Rel. S.C. House of RepresentativesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Thomas v. Cooper River ParkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hutto v. South Carolina Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014
- Layman v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
- Hutto v. South Carolina Retirement SystemDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2012
- Ahrens v. StateSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
- Anonymous Taxpayer v. South Carolina Department of RevenueSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.