Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1993No. 1993-0388Published

1Opinion of the Court

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Ball (1993), Ohio St.3d .] Attorneys at law -- Misconduct -- Six-month suspension -- Neglect of entrusted legal matters. (No. 93-388 -- Submitted May 25, 1993 -- Decided September 22, 1993.) On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court, No. 91-34. On October 21, 1991, the Office of Disciplinary Counsel, relator, filed a complaint with the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court ("board"), charging, inter alia, that respondent, Claire…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. OglesbyOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. EbelOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. GiegelOhio Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API