Legal Opinion
Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Giegel
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 12, 1990No. 90-1125PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
We concur with the board’s findings and recommendations. Respondent is hereby indefinitely suspended from the practice of law. Moreover, the court admonishes respondent that in any application for reinstatement, the court will look for proof that respondent has resolved his alcohol abuse problems and made restitution to persons injured by his misconduct. Costs taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.
2Cited by2 opinions
- Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BallOhio Supreme Court · 1993
- Disciplinary Counsel v. BallOhio Supreme Court · 1993