Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Ebel

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1983No. D.D. No. 83-11PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

After a careful examination and review of the record in this cause, this court concurs with the findings and conclusions of the board that respondent violated DR 1-102(A)(4), DR 6-101(A)(3) and DR 7-101(A)(2) and (3).

It is the judgment of this court that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice of law.

Judgment accordingly.

Celebrezze, C.J., W. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J.P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BallOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Dayton Bar Ass'n v. GrossOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Mahoning County Bar Ass'n v. WalshOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. BallOhio Supreme Court · 1993