Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Andino

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided October 19, 1987No. Docket No. 98860PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMackenzie, P.J.

Pedro Julio Andino, Sr., hereafter respondent, appeals as of right from a January 6, 1987, order terminating his parental rights to his twin minor children, Elba Iris Andino (Abby) and Pedro Julio Andino, Jr. (Junior), pursuant to MCL 712A.19a, subds (d) and (e); MSA 27.3178(598.19a), subds (d) and (e). We conclude that respondent’s parental rights were properly terminated under MCL 712A.19a(d); MSA 27.3178(598.19a)(d) and accordingly affirm.

Respondent became involved with Lisa Arizola sometime in 1978. At that time Lisa had custody of a daughter, April, from her previous marriage to Tim…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. United States v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Neibling v. TerrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
  4. In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. State Bar Grievance Administrator v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lichon v. American Universal InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Lichon v. American Universal InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Lichon v. American Universal InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API