Legal Opinion

Gentry v. Evans

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided August 25, 1969No. Civ. A. No. 2374PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

This action for compensatory and punitive damages for violation of the plaintiff's civil rights by the defendants, 42 U.S.C. § 1985(2), was commenced on May 2, 1969. The defendants seek a summary judgment as a matter of law, on the ground that no genuine issues remain for trial, Rule 56(e), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System (1962), 368 U.S. 464, 468, 82 S.Ct. 486, 7 L.Ed.2d 458, 461 [2], claiming that this action is barred by the running of the applicable statute of limitation.

The conspiracy alleged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Thomas U. Mulligan v. Detective Schlachter, Sergeant Ware, Lieutenant Morin, and Benjamin J. SafirCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  3. Robert William Crawford v. Lt. Woodrow W. Zeitler and the Toledo, Ohio, Police Dept.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Elmore v. EvansDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1976
  2. Jackson v. Cutter Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1970
  3. Beckum v. Tennessee HotelDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1971
  4. Phipps v. ArmourDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1971
  5. Kaltenborn v. Excel PersonnelDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API