Legal Opinion
Kaltenborn v. Excel Personnel
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided February 7, 1972No. C-72-5PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
WELLFORD, District Judge.
In this cause plaintiff, Sarah Kaltenborn, has filed a class action alleging discriminatory employment practices on the part of defendant, Excel Personnel. Plaintiff contends that jurisdiction lies under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. and the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983. Defendant has moved the Court for an order dismissing the complaint on the grounds that it is barred by the Tennessee one-year Statute of Limitations in T.C.A. § 28-304, which reads in pertinent part as…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Thomas U. Mulligan v. Detective Schlachter, Sergeant Ware, Lieutenant Morin, and Benjamin J. SafirCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Robert William Crawford v. Lt. Woodrow W. Zeitler and the Toledo, Ohio, Police Dept.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Madison v. WoodCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Ellenburg v. ShepherdDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1966
- Jackson v. Cutter Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- John H. DRAPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PIPE AND FOUNDRY COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Willett v. WellsDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977
- Kennerly v. Aro, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1977
- Wilson v. Continental Group, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1978
- John H. DRAPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES PIPE AND FOUNDRY COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976