Legal Opinion

Murray v. Helfrich

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1934PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

This is an action for personal injuries. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff appeals.

The plaintiff alleges in substance that while riding with, and as a guest of defendant, she was injured by reason of the gross negligence of defendant and asks for compensation for such injuries.

Defendant answered with a general denial of any negligence on his part and for a further and separate answer alleged, in effect, that the injuries suffered by plaintiff were caused by the negligence of one E. Gr. Swigert in a collision between defendant’s car and a car driven by the said Swigert and that the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. BabcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Dwy v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1915
  3. Feneff v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  4. Ellis v. EssonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Abb v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1902

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. McEwen v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Wiebe v. SeelyOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Peterson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Hicklin v. AndersOregon Supreme Court · 1954
  5. McKay v. Pacific Building Materials Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1937

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API