Legal Opinion

Weiner v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 1, 1927No. 3586PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

Some United States Attorneys, when prosecuting for *523violations of tho National Prohibition, Act (Comp. St. § 101381,4 et seq.), show a disposition to depart as far. as they safely can from the rule which limits cross-examination of the defendant as to prior criminal convictions solely to an attack upon his credibility as a witness (when, as in this case, he has not put his character in issue) and to endeavor thus to lodge in the minds of jurors the thought that, as tho defendant has confessed a previous conviction for the commission of a similar crime, it is likely he…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Dyar v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1911
  3. Mansbach v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
  4. Beyer v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1922
  5. Taliaferro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1914

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Empire Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
  2. United States v. Philip J. Howell, A/K/A James Colburne HowardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  3. Dowling Bros. Distilling Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1946
  4. Edmisten v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  5. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API