Dyar v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Alexander S. Dyar and another were convicted of fraud, and they bring error.
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs in error, Alexander S. Dyar and W. H. Hale, were convicted in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana under an indictment for violation of section 5480, Revised Statutes of the United States, as amended by the act of March 2, 1889 (25 Stat. 273, c. 393 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3696]), although the second count in the indictment charged a conspiracy between Dyar and Hale to commit the offense named in section 5480.
The first indictment, No. 2,576, charged that A. S. Dyar and W. H. Hale did knowingly, willfully, unlawfully,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. . MolineuxNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- State v. AdamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Commonwealth v. JacksonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
- State v. SaundersOregon Supreme Court · 1886
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- United States v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- William Raymond Lindsey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Niederluecke v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Hartwell v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1967
- United States v. David Eugene Morton, James M. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.