State v. Carroll
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WELLS, Judge.
Defendant contends that, even taken in the light most favorable to the State, the evidence is insufficient to support a conviction of second-degree murder. Defendant argues several points, which we shall address in turn.
In order to withstand a motion to dismiss, the State must present substantial evidence of each of the elements of the offense charged. State v. Powell, 299 N.C. 95, 261 S.E. 2d 114 (1980). Our courts have interpreted “substantial evidence” to mean “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” State v. Earnhardt,…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. EarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. ThomasSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- State v. TrexlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MannSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. MidyetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- People v. HoekstraAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- State v. MurphyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.