Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Watrous

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1935No. Crim. 1416PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Appellant was indicted for the offense denounced by section 288 of the Penal Code, and after a trial by the court, sitting without a jury, was found guilty and sentenced accordingly. This appeal is from that judgment, and the order denying a new trial.

There is no necessity to state in detail the character of the acts charged since it is the contention of appellant that at least as far as he is concerned the acts never occurred.

The indictment is in two counts. One count charges certain acts committed against a little girl four years of age, and the second count refers to similar acts affecting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. People v. MayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  3. People v. WilmotCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. People v. LambertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. People v. DelaneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. People v. HurlburtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Cross v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1953
  4. People v. O'MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. People v. LambCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API