Legal Opinion
Kurt Regensburger and Anna Regensburger v. China Adoption Consultants, Ltd., Kenneth Lubowich and Renee Lubowich
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 17, 1998No. 97-2046PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KANNE, Circuit Judge.
The Regensburgers brought this action seeking damages for breach of contract, fraudulent misrepresentation, and negligent misrepresentation. The district court granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. The Regensburgers now appeal that decision. Appellees moved for sanctions against the Regensburgers for frivolous appeal, and that motion was combined with the case on the merits. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the judgment of the district court and deny the motion for sanctions.
I. History
We recite the facts in the light most favorable to the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- L.S. Heath & Son, Inc. v. At & T Information Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Spraying Systems Company v. Delavan, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Lois/USA, Inc. v. Conseco Finance Servicing Corp. (In Re Lois/USA, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Berger v. Xerox Retirement Income Guaranty PlanDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2002
- Sassak v. City of Park RidgeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- Werth Ex Rel. Werth v. Board of Directors of the Public SchoolsDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2007
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.