Legal Opinion
Mesiti v. Microdot, Inc.
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided June 8, 1990No. Civ. 89-321-DPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DEVINE, Chief Judge.
This Order addresses a motion seeking dismissal of Anthony Mesiti’s action to recover costs related to removing hazardous waste from his Keene, New Hampshire, property. A brief summary of the relevant facts, drawn primarily from the complaint, follows.
In 1947 the Central Screw Company of Chicago, Illinois, began manufacturing metal screws and fasteners in Keene, New Hampshire. Central Screw generated and disposed of hazardous, oil-containing substances at the site. In 1975 defendant Microdot, a Delaware corporation, purchased the assets and property of Central Screw.…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Kulko v. Superior Court of Cal., City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- General Electric Company v. Litton Industrial Automation Systems, Inc. And Litton Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Donahey v. BogleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- McClary v. Erie Engine & Manufacturing Co.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1994
- Commerce Holding Co., Inc. v. BuckstoneDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1990
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.