Legal Opinion

In the Interest of S.N.V.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 2011No. 10CA1302PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge RUSSEL,

This case is a modern version of the difficult problem presented to King Solomon: two women claim to be the mother of the same child. Here, one of the women is the biological mother, while the other claims legal motherhood under presumptions set forth in the Colorado Uniform Parentage Act (UPA), §§ 19-4-101 to -180, C.R.8.2011.

Unlike Solomon, we are not free to devise our own solution. We are bound by the UPA, as interpreted by the Colorado Supreme Court in N.A.H. v. S.L.S., 9 P.3d 354, 357 (Colo.2000).

Under these authorities, we conclude that B.V. (wife) may bring an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. R.Mcg. v. J.W.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  2. N.A.H. v. S.L.S.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  3. Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services v. Irene V.California Court of Appeal · 2011
  4. People ex rel. C.L.S.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. In Re the Marriage of MuggeColorado Court of Appeals · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Chatterjee v. KingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  2. In re Guardianship of Madelyn B.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2014
  3. In re the Marriage of LeverettColorado Court of Appeals · 2012
  4. In re the Parental Responsibilities of A.R.L.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Chatterjee v. KingNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API