Legal Opinion

In re the Parental Responsibilities of A.R.L.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 2013No. Court of Appeals No. 13CA0342PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE DUNN

T1 Can a child have a biological mother and a presumptive mother under the Colorado Uniform Parentage Act, sections 19-4-101 to -130, C.R.8.2013 (UPA)? The trial court implicitly answered this question "no," when it denied Elizabeth Limberis' petition for maternity for A.R.L., a child conceived during Limberis' relationship with her former partner, Sabrina Havens. Thus, the trial court did not consider and determine whether Lim-beris was the child's presumed mother under the UPA.

T2 We conclude that, in the context of a same-sex relationship, a child may have two mothers…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Michael H. v. Gerald D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Colgan v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Committee for Better Health Care for All Colorado Citizens v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  5. Elisa B. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Partanen v. GallagherMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API