Legal Opinion

Dawson, Corbett & Shelp v. Lieurance & Canfield Construction Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 18, 1951No. 2477PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Riner, Justice.

This is an action brought in the District Court of Fremont County by Dawson, Corbett and Shelp, a co-partnership composed of Max Dawson, Wesley Corbett and George Shelp doing business in Wyoming, and hereafter for brevity usually referred to as the Shelp firm against the Lieurance and Canfield Construction Company, an Oklahoma Corporation, also transacting business in said State and for convenience designated herein as the “L” Company, Russell L. Lieurance, Jr., Theodore Canfield and also against Lieurance & Company of Wyoming, a corporation which it appears purchased…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jacoby v. City of GilletteWyoming Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Wright v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Knutson v. LasherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  4. Fiorito v. GoerigWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  5. In Re DemingWashington Supreme Court · 1937

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. CHIRIKOFF ISLAND CATTLE CORPORATION v. RobinetteAlaska Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Chandler-Simpson, Inc. v. GorrellWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Tenneco Oil Company v. Henry W. GaffneyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
  4. Wyoming Construction Company v. Western Casualty And Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
  5. Wyoming Construction Co. v. Western Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API