Legal Opinion
Finkielstain v. Seidel
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided January 22, 1988No. 86 Civ. 8406 (PNL)PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LEVAL, District Judge.
This action is for rescission of the sale of a security under the federal securities laws and common law fraud. Defendants First Maryland Savings & Loan, Inc. (“First Maryland”) and Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corporation (“MDIF”) (collectively “defendants”) 1 move to dismiss this action pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) contending that as an “arm” of the State of Maryland, MDIF is protected from suit in federal court under the Eleventh Amendment and that the action against First Maryland must be dismissed because MDIF is the real party in…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lappe v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1994
- Arrow Electronics, Inc. v. Ducommun Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Finkielstain v. SeidelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Walker v. Jon Renau Collection, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- Finkielstain v. SeidelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.