Legal Opinion
Finkielstain v. Seidel
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 8, 1988No. 1188, Docket 88-7174PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
METZNER, Senior District Judge:
Jacobo Finkielstain instituted this action to rescind two loan agreements between himself and First Maryland Savings & Loan, Inc. (First Maryland). After entry into these transactions, First Maryland was placed in receivership under Maryland law which provided that the Maryland Deposit Insurance Fund Corp. (MDIF) shall be appointed receiver of any savings and loan association being operated in an unsafe and unsound manner.
Finkielstain’s complaint alleges violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j, and Rule 10(b)(5)…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Burford v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- in All Cases which have been Consolidated into this Proceeding by Order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation v. Union Carbide Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Purdue Pharma L.P. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
- Riley v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- In re Standard & Poor's Rating Agency LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- SEC v. AhmedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Tabor Court Realty Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.