Legal Opinion
State v. Oklata
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided February 5, 2004No. 03 MA 62PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Gene Donofrio, Judge.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Paul Oklata, appeals from his conviction for driving under suspension and driving under the influence, following a no contest plea, in Youngstown Municipal Court.
{¶ 2} On December 9, 2002, appellant was stopped and arrested by the Youngstown Police Department for the following offenses: (1) failure to use turn signals, in violation of R.C. 4511.39; (2) driving under suspension, in violation of R.C. 4507.02; (3) driving under the influence of alcohol, in violation of R.C. 4511.19(A)(1); and (4) driving under the influence, in violation of R.C.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. WatkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2003
- City of Toledo v. ChiaveriniOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- City of Cleveland v. WanzoOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. Ward, Ca2008-09-083 (3-16-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. GavarkavichOhio Court of Appeals · 2026