Legal Opinion

City of Cleveland v. Wanzo

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 8, 1998No. 73264PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kaepinski, Judge.

Defendant-appellant, Alvin Wanzo, appeals his conviction for domestic violence rendered upon his plea of no contest with a consent to a finding of guilt in the Cleveland Municipal Court. On appeal, defendant argues that (1) the trial court had no authority to accept a no contest plea on behalf of the defendant without first advising him of his constitutional and statutory rights as set forth in Ohio Crim.R. 11(E), and (2) the trial court should have allowed him to withdraw his plea pursuant to his oral motion to vacate. For the reasons that follow, we find merit in the first…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. State v. BallardOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. City of Garfield Heights v. BrewerOhio Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. State v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Parma v. BenedictOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. Clark, 07-Ma-87 (3-13-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. State v. HughesOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. State v. OklataOhio Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. State v. WatkinsOhio Supreme Court · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API