Legal Opinion

State v. Qualls

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1991No. 55033, 57488PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PUDLOWSKI, Judge.

This is a consolidated appeal. Defendant/movant (hereinafter defendant) appeals his conviction in the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis on the charge of possession of heroin, § 195.020 RSMo 1986 (repealed 1989). He also appeals the judgment of the motion court which denied his Rule 29.15 motion.

Defendant’s sole claim on direct appeal is that the trial court committed plain error in admitting into evidence a blue Dormin 1 bottle and its contents because such evidence was the product of an unreasonable search violating the defendant’s Fourth Amendment Right. Defendant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Brower Ex Rel. Estate of Caldwell v. County of InyoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Hester v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. GardnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. MosbyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. State v. LooneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. State v. SchaeferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State v. GrayMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API