State v. Looney
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PREWITT, Presiding Judge.
Defendant was charged with possession of a controlled substance because he “possessed LSD, a controlled substance, knowing of its presence and illegal nature.” Thereafter he filed a motion to suppress evidence. On July 28,1995, the trial court sustained the motion and suppressed the evidence requested. Plaintiff timely filed this appeal. 1
Plaintiff states in its brief that the dispute “is not about the facts but over the law” and “that the circuit court could find the facts as it did.” The facts so found are set out hereafter.
In this case, the arresting officers were…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. WiseSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- State v. LingarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- State v. MilliornSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
- State v. McCrarySupreme Court of Missouri · 1981
- United States v. Santos Villarreal and Sergio GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. RamiresMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- State v. ImmekusMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. SmithMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- State v. PetersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- State v. GarciaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.