Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Weinfeld

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph M. Conroy, J.

This is an article 78 proceeding in the nature of mandamus to compel the respondent, a Judge of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, “ to fix a day certain for the imposition of sentence and the rendition .of judgment against Carmine Gualtieri upon the finding of guilty of the said Carmine G-ualtieri by respondent * * * and to pronounce such sentence and to impose such judgment.” Respondent moves to dismiss the petition for legal insufficiency.

The material facts, as they appear from -the petition and exhibits annexed thereto, are as follows:

On April 2,1964, a complaint was filed in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. . BradnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Matter of Hogan v. N.Y. Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. People Ex Rel. Jerome v. Court of General Sessions of the PeaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
  4. In re CedarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  5. Tonis v. Board of Regents of the UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. BetilloNew York Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. BrodyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1966
  4. People v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API