Legal Opinion

People v. Brody

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided November 17, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

It was error for the court below to direct the substitution of Blor Realty Corporation for defendant Brody over the objection of the People. The proceeding was instituted by the People against defendant Brody who was the only person before the court. No proceeding was brought by the People against the corporation. (See Code Grim. Pro., §§ 675, 677, 681.)

It was likewise error for the trial court to set aside its finding of guilt of defendant Brody and to grant him a new trial. Insufficient facts were presented to the trial court to call for reversal *853of its earlier finding of guilt (cf. Matter…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. O'Connor v. WeinfeldNew York Supreme Court · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. Eros Cinema Corp.Criminal Court of the City of New York · 1971
  2. People v. KadarIthaca City Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API