Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In re Cedar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 23, 1934PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrell, J.

We are of the opinion that the order of the Special Term appealed from was improperly granted and should be reversed.

The undisputed facts are that on September 25, 1928, the petitioner, Cedar, was tried in the Court of General Sessions, New York county, upon an indictment charging him with grand larceny in the first degree. During the progress of his trial the defendant was permitted to withdraw his plea of not guilty to the crime charged in the indictment, and to plead guilty to grand larceny in the second degree. Besides the indictment under which the defendant was on trial, he was charged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte LangeSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. People v. . BradnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  3. People Ex Rel. Sloane v. LawesNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. People v. MarkhamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  5. People v. . CanepiNew York Court of Appeals · 1905

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. O'Day v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
  2. Czaplinski v. Warden of Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. People ex rel. Miresi v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. People v. MellonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  5. People v. HarringtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1967

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API