Legal Opinion
Pesticide Action Network N. Am. v. Cal. Dep't of Pesticide Regulation
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided September 19, 2017No. A145632PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSiggins, J.
*232Defendant California Department of Pesticide Regulation (the Department), approved amended labels for two previously registered pesticides: Dinotefuran 20SG, manufactured by real party in interest Mitsui Chemicals Agro, Inc. (Mitsui), and Venom Insecticide, manufactured by real party in interest Valent U.S.A. Corporation (Valent). The amended labels allowed both pesticides to be used on additional crops and allowed Venom Insecticide to be used in increased quantities. Both pesticides contain the active ingredient dinotefuran, which is from a class of pesticides called neonicotinoids. In…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancho CordovaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Mangini v. R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.California Supreme Court · 1994
- Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Caltec AG v. Dep't of Pesticide Regulation, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Caltec AG v. Dept. of Pesticide RegulationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Friends, Artists & Neighbors of Elkhorn Slough v. Cal. Coastal Com.California Court of Appeal · 2021
- L.A. Waterkeeper v. State Water Resources Control Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2023
- Western States Petroleum Ass'n. v. Cal. Air Resources Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2025