Legal Opinion

Roedenbeck Farms, Inc. v. Broussard

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 1939No. Applications Nos. 24107 and 24108PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The above numbered and styled applications for writs of error are refused. It is deemed advisable, in view of the fact that the question presented by the twenty-first assignment of error in Application No. 24,108 by H. Merlyn Cristie, et al., is not discussed in the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, to state that the said twenty-first assignment of error is not sustained, because it is the opinion of the court that the trial court’s judgment as a whole is correctly construed as adjuding to the cross plaintiffs H. Merlyn Cristie, et al., the title and ownership of the overriding royalties…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trammell v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Whitmire v. PowellTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  3. De Zavala v. ScanlanTexas Commission of Appeals · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Long v. NCNB-Texas National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1994
  2. Home Insurance Company v. GreeneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  3. Hansen v. ChristieCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API