Legal Opinion

De Zavala v. Scanlan

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 28, 1933No. 1456-6140PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMEDBEY, Judge.

In a suit in the district court of Harris county, in which De Zavala, plaintiff in error herein, was plaintiff, and Arcóla Sugar Mills Company and Miss Kate Scanlan, defendants in error herein, were defendants, judgment was rendered in May, 1922, in favor of De Zavala against Areola Sugar Mills Company for $2,500, with interest, and a supersedeas bond signed by Areola Sugar Mills Company as principal and by Miss Kate Scanlan and William J. Dermody as sureties was executed, approved,, and filed. A petition for writ of error in that case was filed, but no transcript was ever…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Trammell v. RosenTexas Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Moody v. SmootTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Gullett v. O'ConnorTexas Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Southern Pac. Co. v. UlmerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  5. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1890

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hamilton v. Empire Gas & Fuel Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Indemnity Insurance v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. W. L. Macatee & SonsTexas Commission of Appeals · 1937
  4. Starnes v. Holloway, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  5. Keystone Copper Mining Co. v. MillerArizona Supreme Court · 1945

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API