Gaskell v. Harvard Cooperative Society
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HARRINGTON, District Judge.
Plaintiff David Gaskell was employed for many years by the Harvard Cooperative Society (the “Coop”). Due to severe illness, he became permanently disabled, 'and, in January, 1988 he resigned from the Coop. Plaintiff Gaskell commenced this action to enforce his rights and those of his spouse, Carolyn Gaskell, to continued health insurance coverage under the Coop’s group health plan. In particular, Gaskell asserts that the Coop failed to provide appropriate “continuation coverage” in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Richard Drinkwater v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
3Cited by29 opinions
- David and Carolyn Gaskell v. The Harvard Cooperative Society, David and Carolyn Gaskell v. The Harvard Cooperative SocietyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- Harsch v. EisenbergCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Phillips v. Riverside, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1992
- David Hager v. Todd G. RowanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
- Holford v. Exhibit Design ConsultantsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.