Legal Opinion

Holford v. Exhibit Design Consultants

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided September 9, 2002No. 5:02-cv-00066PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ENSLEN, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court to consider Plaintiff Lisa Holford’s Application for Default Judgment and Corrected Application for Default Judgment. Defendant Exhibit Design Consultants has opposed the relief. Both parties have had multiple opportunities to file briefs and supporting documents. Hearing of the matter is unnecessary in light of the briefing and the issues presented.

BACKGROUND

Default was entered against Defendant by the Clerk for failing to timely answer and defend. Thereafter, by agreement of the parties, the default was set aside except as to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Blanchard v. BergeronSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Wood v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1982

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Torres-Negron v. Merck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
  2. Brown v. Board of EducationDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2014
  3. Miles-Hickman v. David Powers Homes, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2008
  4. Crosby v. Bowater Inc. Retirement Plan for Salaried Employees of Great Northern Paper, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2003
  5. Pierce v. Visteon Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API