Legal Opinion
Simpson v. Highfill
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 7, 1935No. 22182PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.
Plaintiff in error was plaintiff, and defendants in error were defendants in the trial conrt. They will be so referred to herein.
Plaintiff commenced this action in the district court of Oklahoma county to recover $1,500 alleged to be due him from defendants for commission on an exchange of real estate. The petition alleges that plaintiff is a real estate broker and that the defendants listed their property with him for sale or trade; that plaintiff succeeded in consummating a deal between the defendants and one Parsons whereby a contract was entered into between the defendants and Parsons for…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hogan v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Brown v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
- Jennings v. JordanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- First National Bank v. CochranSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
- Spencer v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morgan v. WhiteheadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Hugh Breeding, Inc. v. GodwinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Whitson v. City of Pauls ValleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938