Legal Opinion

Brunson v. Martin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided January 13, 1899No. 18,607PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Erom the Jay Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

Appellant, as the administrator of Margaret' Stoltz, instituted this proceeding by a petition in the lower court, making the appellees, Martin and Stoltz, executors of the last will and testament of George Stoltz, deceased, and certain legatees under said will, parties defendant to the action. By his petition, appellant'sought to secure an order of the court directing the executors of George Stoltz to pay over to him, as administrator of Margaret Stoltz, deceased, $8,000 which they had in their hands at the date of said Margaret’s death. A demurrer for insufficiency of facts was sustained by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Heilman v. HeilmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Nading v. ElliottIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Ford v. TicknorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Goudie v. JohnstonIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Holbrook v. McClearyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Skinner v. SpannIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Brown v. Union Trust Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Special School District No. 5 v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
  4. St. Mary's Hospital of Evansville v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Wallace v. CutsingerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API