Legal Opinion

Jane Roe v. Jane Doe John Doe

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1994No. 93-1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

28 F.3d 404

Jane ROE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Jane DOE; John Doe, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 93-1991.

United States Court of Appeals,

Fourth Circuit.

Argued March 10, 1994.

Decided June 29, 1994.

1

Gregg Meyers, Wise & Cole, P.A., Charleston, SC, for appellant.

2

John Hamilton Smith, Young, Clement, Rivers & Tisdale, Charleston, SC, argued (Stephen P. Groves, on brief), for appellees.

3

Before HALL and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BRINKEMA, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Virginia, sitting by designation.

OPINION

BRINKEMA, District Judge:

4

The plaintiff-appellant appeals from the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API