City of Bangor v. CITIZENS COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY
District Court, D. Maine
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT & CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
SINGAL, Chief Judge.
This matter came before the Court for the first phase of a bifurcated trial on Plaintiff City of Bangor’s (“City”) claims under both the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (“RCRA”), 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(B), and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), 42 U.S.C. § 9607. Notably, Defendant Citizens Communications Company (“Citizens”) has asserted counterclaims against the City under both CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f)(1), and RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6972(a)(1)(B). The Court received evidence over…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. BestfoodsSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Meghrig v. KFC Western, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- City of Bangor v. Citizens Communications Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Tronox Inc. v. Kerr McGee Corp. (In re Tronox Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Vine Street, LLC v. Keeling Ex Rel. Estate of KeelingDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
- E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
- Murtaugh v. New YorkDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.