Hanke v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local 309
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.
—=This action was instituted by the plaintiffs to enjoin the defendant union and its representatives from further picketing the plaintiffs’ business establishment and to recover damages for the financial loss alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiffs as the result of prior picketing by the defendants.
On the basis of the allegations in the complaint, together with facts set forth in the supporting affidavit of one of the plaintiffs, the trial court immediately and without notice issued a restraining order and order to show cause, temporarily prohibiting the defendant union from…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Thornhill v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Kovacs v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Hudson County Water Co. v. McCarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- American Federation of Labor v. SwingSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. HankeSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Ostroff v. Laundry & Dye Works Drivers' Local No. 566Washington Supreme Court · 1950
- International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 286 v. Sand Point Country ClubWashington Supreme Court · 1974
- Gilbertson v. McLEANOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- Minor v. Building and Construction Trades CouncilNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.