Goldston v. RANDOLPH MACHINE TOOL COMPANY
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggiNS, J.
The plaintiff alleged and offered evidence tending to show (1) he performed labor and furnished material as subcontractor in the construction of a new dwelling which the corporate defendant contracted to build for the individual defendants; (2) the contractor failed to pay for the work done; (3) the plaintiff filed a claim with the individual defendants, or their agent, as provided in G.S. 44-6 to G.S. 44-9, before they completed payment to the contractor; (4) they failed and refused to pay the plaintiff his pro rata share of the amount due on the contract.
• The plaintiff’s evidence, when…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Charlotte Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Southern Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- Guilford Lumber Manufacturing Co. v. HolladaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Pavone Ex Rel. Pavone v. MerionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Economy Pumps, Inc. v. F. W. Woolworth Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Harrison v. KappSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
3Cited by3 opinions
- Norburn v. MacKieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- Tucker v. MoorefieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978