Economy Pumps, Inc. v. F. W. Woolworth Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
EaRNHIll,- J.
Plaintiff seeks to recover on either one of two theories: (1) that tbe Economy Plumbing & Heating Company was a subcontractor, that defendant bad notice that plaintiff bad not been paid for tbe material furnished by it prior to tbe settlement with tbe contractor and notwithstanding such notice failed to retain a sufficient part of tbe contract price to pay for same; and (2) that tbe Economy Plumbing & Heating Company was an agent or employee and not an independent contractor, that when it purchased material from tbe plaintiff it did so on behalf of defendant and that defendant is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Hexamer v. . WebbNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Beach v. . McLeanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- North Carolina Lumber Co. v. Spear Motor Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
- Guilford Lumber Manufacturing Co. v. HolladaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Clark v. . EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Coastal Plains Utilities, Inc. v. New Hanover CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Lautenbach v. MeredithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949
- Carruth v. Valley Ready-Mix Concrete Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949
- RANLO SUPPLY COMPANY v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Ramey v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.