State v. Moran
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DALY, J.
The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (3). The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) instructed the jury that the defendant was required to prove his assertions by a fair preponderance of the evidence and (2) allowed rebuttal testimony that impeached the defendant on a collateral matter.
The juiy reasonably could have found the following facts. On July 17,1996, at about 9:30 p.m., Sundeep Gill, age sixteen, was working as a cashier at a…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- State v. ValentineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- State v. AshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. McMurraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. HallConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- State v. DudleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. MoranSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005