Legal Opinion

State v. Moran

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 25, 1999No. AC 17308PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DALY, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (3). The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) instructed the jury that the defendant was required to prove his assertions by a fair preponderance of the evidence and (2) allowed rebuttal testimony that impeached the defendant on a collateral matter.

The juiy reasonably could have found the following facts. On July 17,1996, at about 9:30 p.m., Sundeep Gill, age sixteen, was working as a cashier at a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. WaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. State v. ValentineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. State v. AshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. State v. McMurraySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. State v. HallConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  3. State v. DudleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
  4. State v. MoranSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  5. State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API