Legal Opinion
State v. Valentine
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 15, 1997No. 15033PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly excluded extrinsic evidence of a prior inconsistent statement that had been offered to impeach the testimony of an eyewitness that the defendant had fatally shot two victims and wounded a third victim. The defendant, Daryl Valentine, appeals1 from the judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of murder in violation of General Statutes § 53a-54a (a),2 criminal attempt to commit assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-49 (a) (2)3 and 53a-59 (a) (l),4 and carrying a pistol…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Douglas v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Greene v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- State v. HinesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. WinotSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. Chasity WestSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.