Legal Opinion
State v. Medved
Supreme Court of Colorado
Decided January 14, 2019No. 17SC33, ColoradoPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE HOOD delivered the Opinion of the Court.
¶1 Whites Corporation donated a conservation easement (CE) and transferred a portion of the resulting CE tax credit to John and Debra Medved. In 2006, the Medveds filed a return claiming the credit. In 2007, Whites Corporation did the same. In 2011, the Colorado Department of Revenue (the Department) disallowed the credit in its entirety. The Medveds claim that the Department acted too late because their 2006 filing triggered the four-year limitations period within which the Department may invalidate a CE tax credit. The Department disagrees,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Turbyne v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
- People v. DiazSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
- People v. BenavidezColorado Court of Appeals · 2009
- Granite State Insurance Co. v. Ken Caryl Ranch Master Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Pringle v. ValdezSupreme Court of Colorado · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carousel Farms Metro. Dist. v. Woodcrest Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- People v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Accetta v. Brooks Towers Residences Condo. Ass'n, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2019
- Francis RUDNICKI and Pamela Rudnicki, as parents, guardians and next friends of Alexander Rudnicki, a minor child v. Peter BIANCO, D.O.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2021
- v. Nat'l Fed'n of Indep. BusSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.