Legal Opinion

Peck v. Searle

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 7, 1933PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaines, J.

The plaintiffs are the widow and three daughters, beneficiaries under the will of John J. Kimmel of Plainville, who died August 4th, 1930. The will named The Commercial Trust Company of New Britain as executor and trustee, “to hold, manage, invest and reinvest” the residuary estate and pay the income to the widow during her life, also to pay her $1000 a year from the principal of the estate if she wished it and as much more as in the judgment of the trustee was necessary for her ease, comfort and support, and upon her death the estate remaining to be divided between the three daughters as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1906
  2. Mathews v. SheehanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  3. Carroll v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. McCarthy v. TierneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  5. Clark v. BeersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Reiley v. HealeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  2. Busby v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  3. Phillips v. MoellerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  4. Ramsdell v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  5. White v. Devito Realty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API