McCarthy v. Tierney
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The complaint alleges that the plaintiff and the defendant are co-trustees of a trust fund of $2,000,000, appointed under the will of Margaret H. McCarthy, late of Greenwich. The will gave the trustees “full power and authority to invest and reinvest said sum upon such terms and conditions as said trustees in their judgment may see fit as fully as an absolute owner, all statutory limits now in force or hereafter enacted as to the investment of trust funds being hereby expressly waived.” Over $600,000 of the fund is on deposit in savings departments of trust companies in this State. Question…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Greenland v. . WaddellNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Belfield v. BoothSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1893
- Russell v. HartleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Cavender v. CavenderSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States Trust Co. v. BohartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Conway v. EmenySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Appeal of SpencerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Gimbel v. Bernard F. & Alva B. Gimbel Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- In Re Application of SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.