Legal Opinion

Colorado General Assembly v. Lamm

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 1, 1987No. 85SA70PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUBOFSKY, Justice.

The Governor of Colorado appeals the Denver district court decision declaring that the Colorado General Assembly has the authority to direct state expenditure of federal block grant monies and that the governor’s vetoes of headnotes that included the federal funds in the general appropriations bill (the “long bill”) in 1982, 1983, and 1984 violated the doctrine of separation of powers. We determine that the expenditure of the funds is within the governor’s executive power to make resource allocation decisions, with the exception of the portions of the block grants subject to…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Legislative Research Commission Ex Rel. Prather v. BrownKentucky Supreme Court · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Lobato v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 2009
  2. Goebel v. Colorado Department of InstitutionsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  3. People v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  4. Feigin v. Colorado National Bank, N.A.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  5. In Re INTERROGATORIES SUBMITTED BY the GENERAL ASSEMBLY ON HOUSE BILL 04-1098Supreme Court of Colorado · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API